Friday, January 13, 2006

Alito Battle Cry


Poor Martha-Ann Alito cracked under the onslaught of vicious smears and insideous innuendo hurled at her humble and honorable husband by the dumber than dirt Democrats on the Judicial Committee. After thousands of their words and hours of demeaning stage play by Democratic hatchet men, Kennedy, Schumer and the mouth, Biden; (although handled patiently, calmly and professionally by Judge Alito)..Mrs.Alito's lips quivered and she broke down in tears of disappointment & sympathy over the relentless, undeserving attacks on her husband's character and remarkable life achievements.

Alito's endurance and knowledge of the law frustrated the pathetic dimwits who failed to pierce the nominees armor..They failed miserably to depict him as a radical extremist that would overturn Roe, set race relations and women's rights back to the 60s, be a rubber stamp for WH power. IOW, a jurist with a RightWing agenda. Their bloviating antics showed them for what they are in an election year..going no where, impotent slaves to their special interest wackoes..AND profoundly ineffectual when they ply their partisan non-sense in a forum where they could examine 15 years of independent legal decisions that would show interested citizens that Judge Alito is a fair, thoughtful and extremely knowledgeable advocate for advocate for the little man expertly fit to sit on the highest Court in the Land.

From R-perspective..the weaping spouse was a nice jarred all who had been lulled by more of the same old, same old, into day dreams of sunny days..The tear jerker woke up the MSM too..the tearful little woman made the front page and everyone's talking about the meany Democrats. At it again?..Don't they EVER give a good man his due if he's NOT a Democrat? Ironically because of rude, small minded, gossip mongers who'll stoop so low as to make a good wife and devoted mother cry, Judge Alito is well on his way to setting those 5-4 decisions Right. The Democrats were right about one concern, Judge Sam Alito is no carbon copy of Justice O'Connor..his confirmation will tip the Court in the Right direction for decades to come..the Robert's Court, including Alito, is just Right..R-prayers are answered.

Wednesday, January 04, 2006



Oh my, the Dems were drooling over this election year scandal and now that the lobbyist extrodinaire, Jack Abramoff, has copped a plea, one would think they'd be clucking like chickens on speed; but nooooo, it's way too quiet in the DC roost. Why? Could it be that this scandal is too complex for the media dimwits to get? OR perhaps a few no-note-democrats are pigeons in the coop of corruption too? For forty years they were the recipents of all the gifts from lobbyists on K Street; but alas, without power no decent lobbyist would give two cents to the minority..they've gotta miss the attention?

Cspan is doing a comprehensive report explaining the whole dirty business..first part aired last night, second it on their website, because it's not your usual FBI scam. You know...tapes of Marion Barry smoking crack, passing the envelope to undercover agents dressed as thee MAN? If Congressmen are to be indicted, Justice will have to show a quid pro quo..bribery is very difficult to prove. If access is all the tribes got, that's legal. At the present time, only a few DC critters are losing sleep; to name a few..Charles Rangel D-NY, Robert Ney R-Ohio; the really juicy pubbies like DeLay, Rove, Frist..have all issued denials and reluctantly returned thousands in campaign bucks tainted by the corrupt lobbyist gone native.

If the Bush Administration was even a little to blame instead of leading the prosecution team, it would be the Little Big Horn all over again..instead the implications of this indictment will take time to sink in. Jack Abramoff pled guilty to Conspiracy, Mail Fraud and Tax evasion. If he gets the max he could do 30 years; plus he's agreed to pay 25 million in restitution to his victims and l.7 million for back taxes..The pampered Congressmen may turn out to be guilty of Golf trips to Scotland...the perks went to their heads, but is it a crime?

It reminds me of that old joke about the Lone Ranger and Tonto: Indians closing in on Lone Ranger and Tonto; Lone Ranger says: Things lookin bad, we're surrounded by Indians; Tonto says: Not WE, Kimosabi?>>s

Abramoff charged several Indian Gaming Tribes 60 Million for his services. He advised the Chiefs that he would be using the money to gain them access and influence with lawmakers; but he told them he couldn't do it alone..the tribes had to donate wampum to Republican campaigns. He used his buddy Scanlon's businesses as fronts to pit the Casino Tribes against each other. Let's be clear, we're not talking about poor Native Americans on the Reservations, it's millionaire Casino Chiefs that hired the guy so they could continue raking in the chips and expand their business ventures. NONE of the profits were earmarked for their own poor people..Casinos provide 500,000 jobs nationwide and employ atleast 2/3rds from Indian is business...they want tax shelters NOT Totems and Tepees for the underpriviledged on the reservations. They learned capitalism from the whiteman and so did Jack Abramoff.